Lot No. LOT-2803 · offered October 9, 2026

Agricultural PolicyLot sheet

Senate Ag Committee Advances Farm Bill 2.0 in 12-11 Party-Line Vote

The Senate Agriculture Committee advanced "Farm Bill 2.0" 12-11 on party lines after McConnell returned from a June fall, leaving a contested SNAP state cost-share as the key dispute.

Market notes

  • Senate Agriculture Committee passed "Farm Bill 2.0" 12-11 along party lines on Wednesday.
  • Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) cast the deciding vote after returning from an absence following a June fall.
  • Congress has not passed a farm bill since 2018; the House passed its version in April.
  • Chairman John Boozman offered a one-year delay on the SNAP state cost-share provision, which Democrats rejected as insufficient.
  • Boozman cited state SNAP payment error rates of 20-25 percent in defending the provision.

The Senate Agriculture Committee passed "Farm Bill 2.0" out of committee on Wednesday on a 12-11 party-line vote, with Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) casting the deciding ballot after a months-long absence from Congress.

The Kentucky Republican returned to the panel this week following a serious fall at his Washington home in June. His absence had stalled the legislation outright: with the seat empty, committee Democrats voted together to block the farm bill, and the panel could not advance it.

The stakes are familiar to growers and lenders. Congress has not passed a farm bill since 2018, even though the sprawling agriculture and food aid package is normally reauthorized every five years. The House passed its latest version in April. The Senate bill now moves toward the floor with committee approval secured by a single vote.

What splits the committee on SNAP?

The central dispute is a provision requiring states to help cover Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program costs alongside the federal government when a state's payment error rates exceed a certain threshold. Panel Democrats oppose the cost shift.

Chairman John Boozman (R-Ark.) offered a compromise to Democrats who raised objections earlier this summer: a one-year delay in the provision's effective date.

"The rest of the story is this: we offered a one-year delay with no payment, no cost. It was rejected," Boozman said during Wednesday's meeting. "We're running out of time, and we're rapidly losing a window that we can actually get this thing passed."

Boozman defended the underlying provision as a tool to push states toward lower error rates, saying its intent was to give states "the help they needed, get them under control, where they didn't have error rates of 20-25 percent."

How did the ranking member respond?

Ranking member Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) acknowledged the delay as progress but said it falls short for states such as Minnesota and Colorado, arguing they need more time and equal resources to bring error rates down.

"We share this goal of reducing error rates, but we recognize the reality that states across the country need time and equal resources to bring them down," Klobuchar said. "I appreciate Chairman Boozman's offer in this bill and the inclusion in this bill of this one-year delay, and it is a big start from where we were."

Which amendments were blocked?

The meeting opened with an attempted amendment from Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) concerning the Save Our Bacon Act. Boozman shut it down, telling her, "you had the opportunity." Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) then attempted an amendment on stockyards and packers, and the chairman likewise closed the door on it.

With the bill now out of committee on McConnell's returning vote, attention shifts to the Senate floor, where Boozman warned the window to pass a full five-year farm bill is rapidly closing.

via thehill.com (Original)

Filed under

  • farm-bill
  • senate-agriculture-committee
  • snap
  • john-boozman
  • amy-klobuchar
Share this article:

More from Nathan Brooks

Nathan Brooks

Show full bio

Staff writer covering regulation, policy and their impact on Agribusiness coverage for industry professionals at Agribusiness Wire.

468 articles

Also in the yard

« Previous articleNext article »